Opinion

Flint Water Crisis

By: Treasure McDaniel

The top of a water tower is seen at the Flint Water Plant in Flint, Michigan

In Flint, Mich., the water has been contaminated with lead. Consumption of lead causes serious sickness and even death. This contamination was most damaging to children. How did a town of 100,000 lose access to something so simple as clean drinking water?

Before this contamination, Flint purchased its water from Detroit, which properly treated the water with orthophosphate. Orthophosphate is a chemical that coats pipes while water flows, preventing lead from leaching in the water supply. In 2014, Flint switched from Detroit’s water supply to the Flint River to save money. The city however, did not use corrosion control. Flint River’s water contains more than eight times as much chloride than Detroit’s water.                                                                                

Chloride is a chemical that is corrosive to metals. When the river’s water flowed through the old lead pipes of Flint, the water ate away at the pipes causing lead to enter the supply. Residents claim they saw the switch as soon as it happened. The water was a brownish-yellow color, smelled, and tasted odd. Flint switched back to Detroit’s water supply in October 2015.

A Chicago resident said “The water was purposely poisoned. If the governor knew that the water contained chloride and that Flint did not follow the same procedures as Detroit, then why would he continue to make the switch?” This resident argued that this water crisis is a conspiracy organized by the government to bring an end to a struggling city.

Another Chicago resident said “This crisis was a poor mistake made by a money hungry governor that picked money over the health of civilians.” This resident argued that the mistake was made by the governor thinking with his pockets instead of his heart.

Advertisements

Categories: Opinion

1 reply »

  1. The governor certainly increased the problem in Flint, but the irresponsible, long standing anti-investigatory tone within the state legislature has long inhibited the state agencies from doing adequate monitoring for developing problems with water quality. Accurate sampling, analysis, and assessment of toxic contaminant pollutants is essential insurance that should inform public health awareness of emerging health risks to guide mitigative action early enough so that huge expenses of the current magnitude don’t happen. Such a waste from the legislative gamble that would not fund DEQ to do the work they were mandated by society to do. This has caused many good people through the years to leave the state agencies, and resulted in less qualified people to gravitate into the agencies… now look how much it is going to cost. Vote for people that understand this fiscal responsibility to fund monitoring that SAVES far more money than it costs. Vote for fiscally responsible people to become legislators….. and governor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s